Journey 3d - Speaking of stereoscopic adventures, I just got back from seeing the new Journey to the Center of the Earth 3d with Brendan Fraser and others. Overall, from a 3d photography point of view it was a really good effort.
I was concerned because the 3d trailer that was shown with Beowulf looked really bad. It was cheesy digital 3d effects with flat (non-stereoscopic) live action composited with it. I was worried that the entire film would be like that and turn even more people off to the 3d process. Well, apparently that trailer was a rough draft, because the final film looks pretty good. It's been filmed in stereo all the way through.
Some of the effects are still a little cheesy, but that's not really the fault of the 3d process, it's just that kind of film. Directors of Photography still have some learning to do to really make use of the process, but this one is a pretty good effort for a first mostly live action dramatic film (not animation or motion capture like Beowulf or concert footage like U2 3d or the Hannah Montana concert film).
In looking at the classic era 3d films (from the early fifties) at the 3d film festival two years ago, I could see the progression of camera work as the cinematographers got better and better at using the stereo cameras. Some of the first films are almost unwatchable (because of parallax and bad window violations), while the later ones really started to take advantage of the special things that 3d can do that don't work in flat photography. Seeing Hondo last spring at the Fox here in Tucson really made me wonder how much better the films could have looked if 3d had remained a viable process.
Hondo was one of the last completed classic era films and it looked spectacular. The 3d was natural looking and not gimmicky (well, except for the one knife stab at the camera during a fight sequence and a couple of other obligatory poke-you-in-the-eye shots) and really captured the open space of the old west.
Journey 3d isn't quite to Hondo level yet, but it's a long way from Bwana Devil. There were some very bad window violations (mostly early in the film in Mr Fraser's character's apartment) that were distracting, but for the most part the framing was pretty good. There were the obligatory poke-in-the-eye shots, with a yo-yo and dinosaur slobber this time (and at one point Mr Fraser spits on the audience) (yeah, I think he's only getting hotter as he's getting older, but I'm still not into being spat on), but they weren't nearly as cheesy as some similar shots in other films.
The script and story were okay (no major plot holes beyond the basic premise, and that's from Verne) and the acting was decent. Unlike Beowulf, this one might still be enjoyable to see flat. There were some chase sequences that would make fabulous motion simulator rides, but they weren't too annoying to watch in a regular theater. From a film critic POV, there's nothing new or groundbreaking in this one. It's all about the effects and the stereo imaging.
Go see it, but be sure to seek out the 3d presentation. There's no real reason to see it otherwise.